Comments on: Comparison between storing images/files in mySQL and on filesystem.

By: Jonathon Sandgren

Jonathon Sandgren — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 04:28:48 +0000

You built some beneficial details there. I did a look for within the matter and observed most folks will consent with your webpage.

By: Word Comparison

Word Comparison — Tue, 11 May 2010 19:37:47 +0000

We will put this logic in our projects. Get back you soon.

By: Taylor

Taylor — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:29:36 +0000

In conclusion, we as programmer should see store large document/image in database as a solution. It’s performance is comparable to storing large document/image on file system.

How do you draw that conclusion from your test as it is 10 times slower???

By: Adil

Adil — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:59:13 +0000

I have to add 25 – 35 MB of data , i have tried everything and mysql 5.0.17 dosent loads more than 1 mb of data.

also i have checked for maximum allowed packet size and i am trying to insert data less (8000 of size) and then trying to append data to the same field by using update query.

UGRENT help needed

By: Al

Al — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:42:47 +0000

Hi Please i can do with your help how do i join the below cf statement so they are one INSERT INTO Artist (images) VALUES () INSERT INTO artists (CompanyName, CompanyTelephone) VALUES ('#formData.CompanyName#', '#formData.CompanyTelephone#') My objective is to see that images end up in same colume as companyname and telephone thanks in advances Regards

By: ok

ok — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:05:02 +0000

good site oucbre

By: Soccer Dad

Soccer Dad — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:48:25 +0000

I dunno – that’s almost a magnitude slower grabbing the file from the DB. I like the idea of storing images in DB as well, but a simple filesystem tree sure seems easier and faster. I’d like to have the second for faster response or a bit more cushion in response.

By: ext3 directory limit - Perth Street Bikes

ext3 directory limit - Perth Street Bikes — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:30:27 +0000

[...] i might try this option for a bit and see how it goes. Test shows no performance hit. Comparison between storing images/files in mySQL and on filesystem. | Sitek Technology Blog __________________ My shitlist.. Are you on [...]

By: Cesar

Cesar — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:28:56 +0000

“uploading to the filesystem is better, because it is easier.”

Not always the easier solution is the best one. In the long run, these turn to be chaotic.

By: etogre

etogre — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:20:17 +0000

Interesting. I like these test runs.

But as with others, I still think uploading to the filesystem is better, because it is easier.